Kevin Rudd seems to be taking Federal control wherever he can. His latest move is take more control over town and regional planning. (Does that mean more regulation or less?)
But why not scrap the States altogether? Aren't States just historical happenstance?
It's an old question. As a State employee I have witnessed the inefficiencies of this bureaucracy first hand. More importantly, I have witnessed the animosity between State and Federal governments where open cooperation should be the order of the day. The States always complain about the lack of understanding of Federal officers. "They don't understand what it's like in Queensland" - true, they don't understand the getting things down the slowest and most expensive way is the how we do it.
But my questions are, what is holding back Federalism (for want of a better word)? Is there not enough public frustration with the States, no political will?
If there was the political will, how would one actually start the process of removing State governments?
Maybe in my lifetime I will get a chance to witness these things.
PS. I'll be in Canberra next week liaising with the Federal government, so the blog may be quite for a while. Maybe when I'm there I can get some thoughts from Federal government officers on this issue.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment